Perception: How larvae feel the world around them
A complete map of the external sense organs shows how fruit fly larvae detect different aspects of their environment.
- Department of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
All animals are exposed to a changing environment. In order to adapt and survive, they need to gather information about their surroundings and choose how best to respond to each condition. For instance, the small larvae of the fruit fly Drosophila melangoster face several decisions as they crawl and dig through the decaying vegetable matter they inhabit: how much heat or fermented alcohol should they tolerate? Which chemical trace should they follow? And should they stay or escape if they sense something (which might be a predator) contact their body?
The larvae perceive the world around them through a complex array of external sense organs that each receive particular environmental cues, such as olfactory, gustatory, temperature or mechanosensory signals (Karkali and Martin-Blanco, 2017; Gomez-Marin et al., 2011; Apostolopoulou et al., 2015; Klein et al., 2015). The sensory organs then relay this information to other cells in the nervous system, which trigger the fly to enact the most appropriate behaviour and physiological response.
Knowing the structure and location of external sense organs can provide new insights into how an animal is able to perceive changes in their environment, including identifying the neural pathways that integrate this sensory information and control how the animal will respond. It also offers fundamental information about which features an animal is interpreting in their surroundings.
In insects, knowing the anatomy of an external sensor is also particularly informative as their bodies are covered by an impermeable and relatively rigid exoskeleton called the cuticle. Most sense organs contain one or more hair-like protrusions, known as sensilla, which have specific characteristics that make them good at detecting certain environmental cues (Chapman, 2013). For instance, the sensilla responsible for mechanosensation are attached to a flexible joint which allows them to perceive the direction and force of a mechanical stimuli. Meanwhile the sensilla for olfaction have many little gaps within the cuticle so that volatile smell molecules can infiltrate and bind to the sensor. Now, in eLife, Andreas Thum and co-workers – including Vincent Richter as first author – report the first complete anatomical description of all the external sense organs of fruit fly larvae (Richter et al., 2024).
The team (who are based at the University of Konstanz, Leipzig University, University of Cambridge, University of Bonn, and German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research) imaged the body of the larvae using three-dimensional electron microscopy. From these images, they were able to determine the external structure of each sense organ by evaluating the anatomy of the sensilla, as well as their associated sensory and accessory (support) cells. Three types of sensilla were identified on the thorax and abdomen of the larvae – named hair, papilla and knob – which either sat alone or clustered together into small groups forming the sense organs (Figure 1). Most of these sensilla displayed structural properties commonly found in mechanosensory cells that perceive information related to pressure, vibration and movement (Karkali and Martin-Blanco, 2017).
Figure 1
Anatomy and function of the external sense organs.
Distributed across the surface of fruit fly larvae are numerous external sense organs that detect particular environmental cues. Along the thorax and abdomen are protrusions, known as sensilla, which were grouped into three categories – papilla (pink), hair (purple), and knob (yellow) – based on how well their shape related to a previous classification (Dambly-Chaudière and Ghysen, 1986). The sensilla are either solitary or grouped together into structures called organs (light and dark blue). Most sensilla in the thorax and abdomen are devoted to mechanosensation, with a small proportion involved in chemosensation or an unknown role. The head of the larvae, known as the pseudocephalon (Pce), contains four sense organs which each contain multiple sensilla: the dorsal organ (DO), terminal organ (TO), ventral organ (VO) and labial organ (LO). Each of these organs detects a specific set of environmental cues, such as contact chemosensation, thermosensation, osmosensation, gustation and mechanosensation.
Figure credit: Adapted from Figure 1B in Richter et al., 2024.
The head of the larvae (also known as the pseudocephalon) contained the highest number and most diverse range of sensilla. Most of these resided in sense organs which each had their own distinct characteristics (Figure 1). This included certain structures and cells that are known to be required for detecting particular environmental cues, including chemicals, temperature, taste and smell among others (Rist and Thum, 2017; Couto et al., 2005, Kwon et al., 2007; Klein et al., 2015). For instance, in the sense organs hypothesized to detect changes in temperature, the sensilla typically had two staked neurons, the lower one forming extensive lamellation, similar to the one seen in the dorsal organ.
The findings of Richter et al. provide new insights in to how fruit fly larvae behave in their natural habitat. In the future, this approach could be applied to other ‘maggot’ species living in different environments to compare how their sensory system influences their behaviour. Notably, Richter et al. also found some sense organs contained multiple dendrites that sense different types of external stimuli. This suggests that there could be cross talk between sensory inputs, and genetic tools available in the fruit fly could be employed to explore this possibility.
There is no doubt that the exquisite description of the external sense organs by Richter et al. will accelerate our understanding of how environmental cues are perceived and processed to generate an appropriate response. Furthermore, combining this information with the tools available to label and manipulate the activity of sensory organs, as well as their partner neurons (Winding et al., 2023), offers a unique opportunity to investigate how animals perceive the world around them.
References
-
Taste processing in Drosophila larvaeFrontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 9:50.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00050
-
The sense organs in the Drosophila larva and their relation to the embryonic pattern of sensory neuronsRoux’s Archives of Developmental Biology 195:222–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438954
-
Active sampling and decision making in Drosophila chemotaxisNature Communications 2:441.https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1455
-
Mechanosensing in the Drosophila nervous systemSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 71:22–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.014
-
A map of sensilla and neurons in the taste system of Drosophila larvaeThe Journal of Comparative Neurology 525:3865–3889.https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24308
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: March 8, 2024 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2024, Berni
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 469
- views
-
- 47
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Perception: How larvae feel the world around them
eLife 13:e96708.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96708
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The fragile X syndrome (FXS) represents the most prevalent form of inherited intellectual disability and is the first monogenic cause of autism spectrum disorder. FXS results from the absence of the RNA-binding protein FMRP (fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein). Neuronal migration is an essential step of brain development allowing displacement of neurons from their germinal niches to their final integration site. The precise role of FMRP in neuronal migration remains largely unexplored. Using live imaging of postnatal rostral migratory stream (RMS) neurons in Fmr1-null mice, we observed that the absence of FMRP leads to delayed neuronal migration and altered trajectory, associated with defects of centrosomal movement. RNA-interference-induced knockdown of Fmr1 shows that these migratory defects are cell-autonomous. Notably, the primary Fmrp mRNA target implicated in these migratory defects is microtubule-associated protein 1B (MAP1B). Knocking down MAP1B expression effectively rescued most of the observed migratory defects. Finally, we elucidate the molecular mechanisms at play by demonstrating that the absence of FMRP induces defects in the cage of microtubules surrounding the nucleus of migrating neurons, which is rescued by MAP1B knockdown. Our findings reveal a novel neurodevelopmental role for FMRP in collaboration with MAP1B, jointly orchestrating neuronal migration by influencing the microtubular cytoskeleton.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Neuroscience
In most mammals, conspecific chemosensory communication relies on semiochemical release within complex bodily secretions and subsequent stimulus detection by the vomeronasal organ (VNO). Urine, a rich source of ethologically relevant chemosignals, conveys detailed information about sex, social hierarchy, health, and reproductive state, which becomes accessible to a conspecific via vomeronasal sampling. So far, however, numerous aspects of social chemosignaling along the vomeronasal pathway remain unclear. Moreover, since virtually all research on vomeronasal physiology is based on secretions derived from inbred laboratory mice, it remains uncertain whether such stimuli provide a true representation of potentially more relevant cues found in the wild. Here, we combine a robust low-noise VNO activity assay with comparative molecular profiling of sex- and strain-specific mouse urine samples from two inbred laboratory strains as well as from wild mice. With comprehensive molecular portraits of these secretions, VNO activity analysis now enables us to (i) assess whether and, if so, how much sex/strain-selective ‘raw’ chemical information in urine is accessible via vomeronasal sampling; (ii) identify which chemicals exhibit sufficient discriminatory power to signal an animal’s sex, strain, or both; (iii) determine the extent to which wild mouse secretions are unique; and (iv) analyze whether vomeronasal response profiles differ between strains. We report both sex- and, in particular, strain-selective VNO representations of chemical information. Within the urinary ‘secretome’, both volatile compounds and proteins exhibit sufficient discriminative power to provide sex- and strain-specific molecular fingerprints. While total protein amount is substantially enriched in male urine, females secrete a larger variety at overall comparatively low concentrations. Surprisingly, the molecular spectrum of wild mouse urine does not dramatically exceed that of inbred strains. Finally, vomeronasal response profiles differ between C57BL/6 and BALB/c animals, with particularly disparate representations of female semiochemicals.
